Archive for August, 2009

Why ‘a word from our sponsor’ should be given more thought

August 20th, 2009 by Clare Ridley

Sponsorship is a hot topic in marketing and PR, and lately has been causing some debate in the Eulogy! offices. With the Olympics round the corner and the Rugby World Cup arriving in 2015, there are a huge number of opportunities for brands to get their hands on the coveted ‘official sponsor’ slot.

To kick off with, it’s important that companies choose the right event. Besides the business ramifications of picking the most relevant audience, consumers need to instantly see the point of the tie-up between the brand and event or product it’s getting behind.

Some things do go naturally hand in hand – beer and football, cocktails and fashion – but these days it’s not enough simply to choose the closest fit.  A successful sponsorship deal is one that relies on a real affinity between brand and event that stays in the hearts and minds of audiences because it was funny, touching or just simply spot-on in terms of relevance.  Anything that makes us sit up and say ‘that’s a good match’ has ultimately done the job.  Anything that leaves consumers with a confused expression on their faces has not delivered anything for the client or the sponsorship property.

This year has seen a number of Eulogy! clients embark on intriguing sponsorship deals.  The Intellectual Property Office, the government department that processes trademark and patent applications, might not be a high-street name but has proved the perfect partner for the Science Museum’s Wallace & Gromit exhibition.  Similarly, French black raspberry liqueur Chambord has cleverly carved itself a niche as ‘the spirit of fashion’ through its long-running London Fashion Weekend sponsorship.  It’s now pulled off a major sponsorship coup as the first-ever presenting sponsor of a West End show – Breakfast at Tiffany’s at London’s Theatre Royal Haymarket. Clearly, it pays to be relevant but creativity is key.

[top]

Digital is nothing to be scared of

August 13th, 2009 by Andrew

Hello – I’m onlinefire’s newest recruit. You’d think I might be a bit daunted about entering working life; what with the world deep in recession, under the grip of swine flu and at the mercy of 10 million Tweeters, it’s all changed very, very quickly.

But I actually think it’s an exciting time to be venturing into online PR.The methods of PR that companies are using are completely evolving through new media, making the opportunity to do something exciting and innovative with a campaign absolutely huge.

Whether you believe that social media symbolises the future of all media and communications or not, at the very least we can agree that it represents a democratisation of information – consumers are starting to speak up and companies are starting to listen. As the marketing director of the IAB  attested when he recently visited Eulogy!, digital and PR are becoming ever more closely aligned.

Social media sites have completely transformed the way brands and consumers interact. The relationship is becoming increasingly blurred. Rather than simply observing a press campaign, it’s got to the point where your average Facebook user, blogger, or Tweeter is becoming part of the campaign themselves. Likewise, campaigns are becoming much more tailored to the individual.

User-generated content, blogs and word-of-mouth are already playing a massive role in online PR; witness the success of the recent ‘Best Job in the World’ press campaign to see that. But online individuals are a fickle bunch, wanting more from the brands they consume like never before, so to get them on board is often easier said than done.

So what better place to face the challenge than with onlinefire? Here, it’s clear that everyone believes new media is something to embrace, rather than something to be scared of. Brands are increasingly realising that new media is not a fad and that it’s where a significant portion of future PR lies. It’s great to belong to a company that is at the forefront of this exciting space.

[top]

Too much media choice?

August 7th, 2009 by Phil

Team Eulogy! recently welcomed Kieron Matthews from the IAB for one of our regular ‘Learn & Burn’ sessions.  As well as talking about the IAB’s work and giving his view on the general media landscape, Kieron instigated something of a discussion when he casually asked who preferred Sky Digital to Virgin Media.

I found myself in the minority when proclaiming that Freeview was my preferred choice.  Ignoring the gasps and cries of ‘Luddite’ which followed I went on to make the point that, to me, paid-for digital TV services simply deliver too much choice.

This got me wondering whether the changing, digitised media landscape is such a good thing. 

The assumption is that consumers want more choice; but whether this is true or not, the provision of more choice brings its own consequences.  In the television industry the traditional ad-funded model is failing, or at least stalling, because of dropping revenue, audience fragmentation, the need to expand output in the face of reduced budgets, and competition from the internet.  As a result consumers do have greater choice but quality is undoubtedly beginning to suffer. 

But aside from this there is an even greater issue.  What will these changes mean to the thousands of people who are currently employed in television production?

The term Luddite  comes from a period in British history when the Industrial Revolution threatened the livelihoods of everyday people.  Even the most ardent supporter of the new digital age and the myriad choices it brings can’t deny the similarities between the plight of those eighteenth century textile workers and the uncertain future of many in the media today.

[top]

Rebranding – more than just a name

August 3rd, 2009 by Clare Ridley

Get home after work tonight, turn on your Sky box and you’ll be bamboozled by hundreds of pay TV channels, all demanding your attention.  Most brands only have a handful of competitors but in the pay TV world, things are different.  If you want to stand out, your brand name is the first thing that today’s channel-hopping audiences look for.

There has been a slew of TV channel rebrands in recent years, from the now ubiquitous Dave to the more obscure Alibi and Yesterday.  There’s even a channel called ‘Really’ – really?

Eulogy! client Comedy Central was one of the more recent rebrands.  Formerly Paramount Comedy, a name that said safe, US comedy, the rebrand to its bigger, badder and bolder parent channel from across the pond meant audiences knew exactly what they were getting – a modern comedy channel, dedicated to delivering top-notch comedy.

So do channel rebrands work?  Well, viewing figures certainly say so.  Dave has recently recorded a record 2.66 million viewers for its resurrection of Red Dwarf and Comedy Central’s viewing figures have shot up by 59%.  What’s most important though is making sure your proposition is clear and unmistakable.  It needs to be more than just a gimmicky name – the programming needs to fit with the brand values already associated with the new name, so viewers understand exactly what you stand for as a channel.

[top]