Archive for the ‘TV’ Category

Has the world gone 3D crazy?

February 25th, 2010 by Georgia Field

For a majority of consumers, 3D has always been about film, but a recent series of media developments have thrust into the mainstream.  Whether it be sport,  television or even the first-ever 3D catwalk at the Burberry’s  London Fashion Week show, I think we can safely say that nothing is off-limits from being ‘three-dimensionalised’.

Without question, the success of Avatar has had a huge impact, so much so that I wonder how long it might have taken the phenomenon to catch on if it wasn’t for the 3D James Cameron epic. Could we still be fumbling around with dodgy old novelty glasses with the lenses cut out and replaced with cheap blue and red cellophane? Probably not, but I don’t think that would be miles from the truth. For the general public, Avatar made 3D cool.

But the million-dollar question is where the technology will take us. The explosion of excitement around 3D makes it seem like anything is possible. Who knows, with the pace of technology in ten years’ time, 2D viewing might be as archaic as the gramophone. It’s even been mooted that 3D contact lenses could be the norm.

All this seems very exciting. But at the same time, I have to wonder if there’s going to be a bit of a backlash.  How much do we really want to see a close-up of a sweaty rugby player as he grapples with four other guys in the scrum, or a malnourished model limping towards us on her way down the catwalk?

Whatever your opinion, 3D is upon us and this time it would seem well and truly here to stay.

[top]

Mine’s a generic unlabelled beer bottle please

September 21st, 2009 by Claire Burgess

As you settle in front of the TV have you ever paused to lament the fact that no one ever walks into The Vic and asks for a pint of Carling? Why’s it always the ‘usual’? And why do the cast of Hollyoaks never pop down to Topshop?

How much does this impact the realism of the storyline? Well apparently enough for the Government to decide that it’s time to abolish laws preventing product placement on UK television screens. Although the BBC remains exempt, as do children’s programmes, this is one of the biggest changes in our recent television history.

But does it work? The Government’s own research has found that less than a quarter of people have felt influenced to buy something after seeing it on a TV show. So why are advertisers so keen to get their products in our programmes?

When the cast of The Hills cruise in their Lexus and Porsches, the judges of American Idol carefully display Coca-Cola or Carrie splurges on yet more Choos –  millions are watching. And it’s not just about getting in front of people. The subtle, or not so, power of association can be worth more than any cheque, and brands are clamouring to align themselves with the aspirational characters we love to watch. 

As broadcasters wrestle with the ever-tightening grip of declining ad budgets product placement represents a fruitful source of revenue. Ad funded programming has sailed silently into our TV schedules and we’ve hardly even noticed. Plus more budget means more new commissions, so surely we’re onto a good thing?

A word of caution. Done wrong, product placement ruins the programming it’s supposed to enhance and alienates viewers. The rules are clear. For consumers it has to be relevant and fit the context of the programme. For brands it must align with their broader strategy and create a meaningful engagement with the audience.

[top]

Rebranding – more than just a name

August 3rd, 2009 by Clare Ridley

Get home after work tonight, turn on your Sky box and you’ll be bamboozled by hundreds of pay TV channels, all demanding your attention.  Most brands only have a handful of competitors but in the pay TV world, things are different.  If you want to stand out, your brand name is the first thing that today’s channel-hopping audiences look for.

There has been a slew of TV channel rebrands in recent years, from the now ubiquitous Dave to the more obscure Alibi and Yesterday.  There’s even a channel called ‘Really’ – really?

Eulogy! client Comedy Central was one of the more recent rebrands.  Formerly Paramount Comedy, a name that said safe, US comedy, the rebrand to its bigger, badder and bolder parent channel from across the pond meant audiences knew exactly what they were getting – a modern comedy channel, dedicated to delivering top-notch comedy.

So do channel rebrands work?  Well, viewing figures certainly say so.  Dave has recently recorded a record 2.66 million viewers for its resurrection of Red Dwarf and Comedy Central’s viewing figures have shot up by 59%.  What’s most important though is making sure your proposition is clear and unmistakable.  It needs to be more than just a gimmicky name – the programming needs to fit with the brand values already associated with the new name, so viewers understand exactly what you stand for as a channel.

[top]