Coming to terms with my inner green (and not in an environmental way)

October 12th, 2011 by Louisa

On Thursday I boarded a plane with trepidation. Not because I am a nervous flier, but because I was headed up to Edinburgh for the final instalment of my MBA – Organisation Behaviour. Having been a model student and completed my homework my nerves didn’t stem from being unprepared, but because the subject matter seemed extremely green for a red and I feared I was in for four days of hell.

If that last sentence was utter gobbledygook to you, you’re not alone. I also stumped my fellow study groupers with the same sentiment. Following a lecture on individual difference, we were allotted our syndicate teams and asked to discuss the kinds of individual data we captured and acted upon within our organisations (for those of you that know me, the word data meant I was up out of my seat and in the break-out room before anyone else had even gathered their files – if there’s anything I know its data, so all my fears evaporated – this would be a breeze).

I shared my group with people from huge organisations such as British Gas, J&J, Royal Bank of Canada and people from smaller companies including a steel manufacturer and vaccine producer. Spurred on by data collection, I set about mining the information from my colleagues – although none of them had much to say (until we went on to discuss data privacy – but that’s a whole other blog post) further than discussing what happens to the information collected at interview and during appraisals. I on the other hand was fit to bursting with oodles of individual difference information on my fellow Eulogites. This is because we use a psychometric testing tool called Insights. However, where some organisations seemed to use similar tests for candidate selection, at Eulogy! we use it to understand ourselves and team mates. In a nutshell (and at a very basic level) Insights through a series of multiple choice questions assigns you a colour either Red, Green, Yellow or Blue and attached to each colour are a series of traits which suggest how you manage people and how you yourself like to be managed – from your communication preferences through to your speed of work. This has become a part of Eulogy! culture. We all joke about our colours and are constantly reminded by our blue colleagues to TIDY UP or encouraged by our more yellow ones to come for a drink, however, behind the fun facade it really has helped us at an operational level. We are all aware of each others’ colour and make a conscious effort to work in the ways that suit that person, making a very harmonious (most of the time) and conflict free work place. One of our common sayings is that it PR not ER, but this reminds us that the job itself is stressful enough without having to worry about team conflicts – and Insights has helped us to eradicate this.

I was astonished to find that Eulogy! (and indeed the PR industry as a whole) was well ahead of the game when it came to Organisational Behaviour (particularly given the size of companies and range of sectors represented on the programme who in my mind were the guys to follow) – however, given our PR Week Best Places to Work accolade last week, I shouldn’t have been so quick to judge. Lesson learnt. At least I’ve now got something to write about in the exam in December – not bad for an uncaring red. I’ll be fascinated to see whether my green side increases as a result of my stint in Edinburgh.

[top]

Absolutely fussing over nothing?

September 2nd, 2011 by Phil

So Absolutely Fabulous is making an anniversary return and, whether you’re popping the cork on your nearest bottle of Bollinger or think the joke has since worn as thin as a Gucci pashmina, it’s a story which has gained much interest.  And rightly so.  As Mark Borkowski suggests as he airs his opinions on the subject here and here, the level of promotion (and as a result, buzz) around the show’s latest outing is enough to make any PR team very proud.  But the rest of his view, to me, is a little precious.

As a PR, I’m not remotely threatened by the damage Borkowski suggests will be wrought on my reputation, or that of my industry, by the characters in Absolutely Fabulous.  The show, arguably a classic of British comedy, is populated by caricatures and scripted around hyper-real situations, told to the audience in a familiar comedic format, set to a laughter track.  What’s more, it’s been part of the television landscape, on and off, for two decades.  Will its appearance really make any difference to how PR and its people are perceived, especially when it’s worth noting that with the greatest will in the world, these new episodes won’t stray more than a few drunken steps from the themes of the original, for fear of disappointing a nostalgia loving audience?

My issue with Borkowski’s viewpoint is twofold.  Firstly, it doesn’t matter what the wider audience thinks about Ab Fab; it’s what our audience thinks.  Are we really suggesting that client budget holders, the channel owners, the industry experts, the media at large, the users of our skills and services, will base their opinion on something that’s been part of the national consciousness for so long?  Anyone can tell I’m not from the Ab Fab mould within the first 30 seconds of meeting me, so what’s the worry?  And secondly, if we’re going to think about changing perceptions, shouldn’t our time and effort be focused on building on the existing stature and value of PR to these aforementioned audiences, so we’re able to secure even larger shares of the budget?  This, to me, should be based on what PR can and does achieve, and has nothing to do with bemoaning the misadventures of an obviously fictional character.

Yes, Lynne Franks received some stick through association, but that also didn’t stop her highlighting her role as the show’s inspiration (in true self-promotional style).  Say what you like about her but Franks has always been a smart PR operator, especially when she recognised the value her association with Ab Fab delivered over any negative connotations, and went on to build a career out of it.

Getting hung up on a TV show which the entire audience knows is nothing more than a fashion-conscious joke seems a little like overreaction, or perhaps it’s simply a way of Borkowski saying something mildly controversial to generate some self-promotion of his own.  I suppose that’s what ‘PR gurus’ are famous for.

Absolutely Fussing over nothing?

[top]

Breaking the bubble but not the alarm clock

August 12th, 2011 by Anthony

Being in between my second and third year at university it is fair to say that I am currently living in a bit of a life bubble (mostly consisting of lie-ins, day time TV and questionable pizza). It is because of this delightful bubble that getting up first thing on Monday morning was not easy. Needless to say, my alarm clock and I had a severe falling out. However, since then we have made up and I am very grateful for his services as they led to me spending a cracking week at Eulogy!

The Eulogy! team not only let me come and experience what working in an agency is like, but got me involved with real work on real accounts, producing work for important clients. Everyone went out of their way to get me involved and the fact that I felt like part of the team after only a week is a real testimony to how open and fun the environment at Eulogy! is.

From brainstorming with the team to speaking to journalists on behalf of clients, I feel that I contributed to the team and gained some valuable experience this week. I feel that I have genuinely gained as much of an idea as you can get (without actually working there) about life at an exciting PR agency.

Although I have gained valuable work experience this week, I have also gained a lot more. During my time at Eulogy! I have met some very cool and interesting people and with them I have smiled, a lot, and for that, to everyone at Eulogy!, thank you.

JJ
Work experience 8th-12th August 2011

[top]

No promos, no plugs. Adrian Brady discusses the Guardian’s PR crack down

August 11th, 2011 by Anthony

In addition to their article on the topic, PR Week’s podcast adds weight to the discussion of the Guardian’s new editorial code. Our chief exec Adrian Brady shares his views.

[top]

Draw the line at crime

August 5th, 2011 by Ben Powell

I’m gobsmacked by reports in PR Week that some in the PR industry have yet to turn down an invitation to improve Colonel Gaddafi’s image.

Gaddafi

I know these are difficult financial times, but by adding Gaddafi to your portfolio is hardly going to be the jewel in the crown that has prospective clients banging down the door. Also, I’d question the longevity of such an account give the current situation in Libya!

Though seriously, why would any business in their right mind be happy to attempt to work with someone against whom the International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for alleged crimes against humanity? In fact, any PR agency that is bonkers enough to take on the ‘account’ is likely to see an exodus of clients and staff not keen on the new addition to the portfolio.

Also, the damage to the reputation of the PR industry caused by any agency agreeing to work with Gaddafi could be huge.

Of course every legal business – including those that supply military hardware and tobacco products – has a right to communicate their offering, but dictators condemned by the worldwide community and having an international arrest warrant against them have frankly forfeited that right.

That leaves the thorny question of the regimes in Syria and Bahrain who have been attacking their citizens – should PR agencies be happy to represent them and promote their messages? In my mind eyes, yes they do. After all, they are Governments recognised by the international community and unless the legal situation changes have a right to communicate their messages to the wider world.

Nevertheless, agencies that do take on such accounts would have to carefully communicate their reasons why to clients and staff who would be within their rights to be dissatisfied with this situation.

However, with Gaddafi there is no ‘grey’ area for debate – for agencies it’s a straightforward no no.

[top]

page 2 of 22

« prev next »