Posts Tagged ‘branding’

Brand allies for tennis champions

June 25th, 2010 by Elaine

Yesterday’s conclusion of the longest match in the history of tennis saw many of the E! team clustering around the television feeling sorry for Nicolas Mahut and marvelling at how tall John Isner is.

In what was a seriously impressive display of stamina and determination, John and Nicolas took the match to an incredible 70-68 score in the final set, after 11 hours and 5 minutes of play. But what next?  Well, being dedicated media / advertising geeks here at Eulogy!, we immediately began to discuss the inevitable ad deals which will be coming the way of these players in the coming weeks and months.  Viagra, Duracell, Pringles and Long Johns (!) were all suggested, and I’m sure we’ll see similar brands throwing their hats in the ring to snap these guys up.

On a serious note, this issue raises what we are constantly saying on behalf of our marketing clients: sponsorship and celebrity endorsement should always centre around a valid and relevant link from endorser to brand; there’s nothing worse than a sponsorship deal that leaves consumers confused as to what the connection is.

We’ll be keeping our eyes peeled to see what happens next for these players; hopefully they’ll fit in a nice long rest before embarking on anything new!

[top]

The portrayal of PR

July 29th, 2009 by Katrina

As Eulogy!’s resident film geek, it never fails to amaze me how badly films seem to understand PR. Take Hancock, for example, where the ‘PR’ man actually worked in branding. Or de Niro’s role in Wag the Dog, where his character veers wildly from spin doctor to – bizarrely – warmonger to film director – but never actually what I would term PR.

This misunderstanding of the scope of PR runs across TV as well – just think how many people in the world think PR is what Edwina does in Ab Fab, or the spin doctoring in the BBC’s Absolute Power. While it might be part of the job (sometimes) to drink champagne, hold random brainstorms in circular rooms or spend time at long client lunches, nothing as yet has truly encapsulated the work that goes in behind the scenes to these perks or the real scope of the role.

Perhaps it’s because PR is so multidimensional; even in our office the work I do from day to day can vary wildly from what my colleagues are up to. Maybe it’s down to the shifting nature of media relations/ corporate communications/ event management/ client management and the hundred other roles that PR can, and does, accomplish. I just know I still have trouble explaining what my job really entails to my parents when something we have done appears in the paper.  Should PR do a better job on its own coverage?

[top]