Posts Tagged ‘brands’

“Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.”

January 25th, 2011 by Phil

Churchill01

In his leader column PR Week’s Danny Rogers has given his thoughts on consolidation (or lack of it) in the PR industry. Alongside his top line predictions for 2011, he makes the comment that “few PR agencies have achieved the scale required to challenge management consultancies – or even some advertising shops – for really lucrative strategic comms contracts from big business”.

In many respects he’s absolutely right. Scale is often a necessity when squaring up to the competition, and especially when you’re hoping to catch the eye of the newest big brand (with matching budget), being a fish capable of powerful breast stroke isn’t a bad thing.

But if we put scales (pun intended) aside for a moment, there’s also the issue of whether PRs are actually able to generate this kind of strategic thinking at all. It still amazes me that for every carefully considered, objectively underpinned and strategically directed campaign, a myriad more exist (at least at pitch stage) that go straight for the tactical spectacular, without a moment’s thought given to the ‘why’ and the ‘how’.

I think there are two fundamentals at play here. Firstly, a lot of PR agencies and consultants don’t know the difference between a strategy or tactic, and think objectives such as ‘make me / my brand famous’ are enough to govern the campaign. What’s more, they often bypass the ‘thinking’ part of the process entirely, and move straight on to dazzling creativity and tactics.

Secondly (and perhaps more tellingly) is the reticence of some clients to share with their agencies the salient details needed to make these kinds of strategic decisions in the first place. This study from late last year stuck in my mind, as it begs the question, if the marketing function is disconnected from a business’s strategy, what hope for (bolted on) PR?

I would say this (it’s our blog after all), but as an agency we pride ourselves on not only knowing our Os, Ss and Ts, but on our ability to confront clients, regardless of their size or the scale of the challenge, to demand the information and insight we need to make the informed choices necessary to achieve agreed and measurable objectives. Not only does it mean we’re all swimming in the right direction once the campaign goes live, but it also makes for a more exciting and inspiring journey for both us and the brand we’re representing.

[top]

Marmite brands #1: Lady Gaga

October 19th, 2009 by Phil

Love her or hate her, you have to admit that Lady Gaga has done something special.

In a relatively short space of time she’s gone from a nobody to become one of the most exciting, inventive and inspiring pop stars of the Noughties.  While her peers veer wildly from one extreme (bemoaning problems like music piracy) to the other (having very public breakdowns), 2009 has seen the emergence of an artist who has rewritten the rulebook when it comes to making headlines, all in the name of art.

Her live performances never fail to be spectacular (exploding firework bra anyone?), and even the most mundane events like boarding an aeroplane gain significant column inches.  She even provides forums the blogs with plenty to feast on.

But ‘poon or peener’ aside, for me the success of Lady Gaga is primarily down to one thing; some damn good PR.  The team around her has managed to create a water-tight persona (or should we say brand) with which to stir up controversy and interest, the likes of which hasn’t been seen in a long time.  In a music market dominated by X Factor-style competitions, where new acts are created in front of the camera, warts and all, it’s refreshing to see a marketing approach that’s based on the creation of an enigmatic ‘superstar’, where not a shaft of light from backstage is ever glimpsed. 

We’re never privy to the ‘real’ Lady Gaga, the person behind the make-up.  There are no stories, or photos, of her falling out of a nightclub drunk, upset at being jilted by an ex-lover, overjoyed that she’s reached number one in the charts.  There constantly remains an air of mystique, carefully controlled and refined, where art and performance become the overarching messages, and the usual ‘girl next door does good’ angle fails to materialise.

As PR machines go, Lady Gaga and her record company are on to a winner.  She might have a lifelong career or be the proverbial one-hit wonder, but someone who’s taken less than a year to build up the admiration and reputation as someone as established as Queen of Innovation Madonna deserves to be watched with close attention. 

Then again, perhaps it really is all about the art.

[top]

Flash – saviour of the universe

September 23rd, 2009 by Izzy

Perhaps my title is a little over ambitious. I’m not suggesting that flash mobs are about to conquer the world, but they’re exciting and entertaining, and when done correctly can be a great way to encourage consumers to engage with your brand.

The Eulogy! team recently took part in a flash mob at Liverpool Street station for our client Zanussi. Now I have to admit, I was slightly embarrassed at having to strike my best model pose while walking backwards up an escalator in front of hundreds of bemused commuters. However, watching passersby stopping to call their friends to tell them about the madness they’d just witnessed made me realise just how effective such stunts can be.

When times are tough and the papers are full of doom and gloom it makes sense to give consumers something to smile about, and though they may not be able to save the universe, making people smile is something I’ve realised flash mobs are pretty good at.

[top]

Mine’s a generic unlabelled beer bottle please

September 21st, 2009 by Claire Burgess

As you settle in front of the TV have you ever paused to lament the fact that no one ever walks into The Vic and asks for a pint of Carling? Why’s it always the ‘usual’? And why do the cast of Hollyoaks never pop down to Topshop?

How much does this impact the realism of the storyline? Well apparently enough for the Government to decide that it’s time to abolish laws preventing product placement on UK television screens. Although the BBC remains exempt, as do children’s programmes, this is one of the biggest changes in our recent television history.

But does it work? The Government’s own research has found that less than a quarter of people have felt influenced to buy something after seeing it on a TV show. So why are advertisers so keen to get their products in our programmes?

When the cast of The Hills cruise in their Lexus and Porsches, the judges of American Idol carefully display Coca-Cola or Carrie splurges on yet more Choos –  millions are watching. And it’s not just about getting in front of people. The subtle, or not so, power of association can be worth more than any cheque, and brands are clamouring to align themselves with the aspirational characters we love to watch. 

As broadcasters wrestle with the ever-tightening grip of declining ad budgets product placement represents a fruitful source of revenue. Ad funded programming has sailed silently into our TV schedules and we’ve hardly even noticed. Plus more budget means more new commissions, so surely we’re onto a good thing?

A word of caution. Done wrong, product placement ruins the programming it’s supposed to enhance and alienates viewers. The rules are clear. For consumers it has to be relevant and fit the context of the programme. For brands it must align with their broader strategy and create a meaningful engagement with the audience.

[top]

Rebranding – more than just a name

August 3rd, 2009 by Clare Ridley

Get home after work tonight, turn on your Sky box and you’ll be bamboozled by hundreds of pay TV channels, all demanding your attention.  Most brands only have a handful of competitors but in the pay TV world, things are different.  If you want to stand out, your brand name is the first thing that today’s channel-hopping audiences look for.

There has been a slew of TV channel rebrands in recent years, from the now ubiquitous Dave to the more obscure Alibi and Yesterday.  There’s even a channel called ‘Really’ – really?

Eulogy! client Comedy Central was one of the more recent rebrands.  Formerly Paramount Comedy, a name that said safe, US comedy, the rebrand to its bigger, badder and bolder parent channel from across the pond meant audiences knew exactly what they were getting – a modern comedy channel, dedicated to delivering top-notch comedy.

So do channel rebrands work?  Well, viewing figures certainly say so.  Dave has recently recorded a record 2.66 million viewers for its resurrection of Red Dwarf and Comedy Central’s viewing figures have shot up by 59%.  What’s most important though is making sure your proposition is clear and unmistakable.  It needs to be more than just a gimmicky name – the programming needs to fit with the brand values already associated with the new name, so viewers understand exactly what you stand for as a channel.

[top]